Success comes with a price. As of July 1, 2022, influencers with more than 500,000 followers (“Major Influencers”) will be under Dutch Media Authority (Commissariaat van de Media) supervision due to a new Policy Rule. As such, Major Influencers will be required to comply with additional advertising rules from the Dutch Media Act (Mediawet). This GT Alert reviews the reason for the new Policy Rule (Beleidsregel kwalificatie commerciële mediadiensten op aanvraag 2022)1, the conditions to qualify as a Major Influencer, and the additional advertising rules and implications. 

Notwithstanding the buzz surrounding the new Policy Rule, the regulation of influencers is not a new phenomenon in the Netherlands. According to the Advertising Code for Social Media & Influencer Marketing, influencers, regardless of the number of followers, already must be transparent about paid collaborations.

In 2018 the European Commission adopted the revised Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD) to place online content under supervision of member state authorities. The revisions specifically aimed to regulate influencers. However, both the revised AVMSD and the implementations in the Dutch Media Act left unsaid when the Dutch Media Act applies to influencers.2 As a result, the Dutch Media Authority, which supervises compliance with the Dutch Media Act, issued the Policy Rule. The Netherlands is one of the first EU member states to issue guidance on how to qualify influencers with respect to the revised AVMSD.

According to the Policy Rule the Dutch Media Act shall also apply to influencers: 

who publish at least 24 videos per year;

on YouTube, TikTok or Instagram;

who are registered with the Dutch Chamber of Commerce (KVK) for the purpose of publishing videos for economic benefit; and

who earn money or receive products from their videos.

As of July 1, 2022, Major Influencers must comply with the same advertising rules as on television and must register with the Dutch Media Authority. Besides the 500,000-follower threshold, the limitation of supervision to YouTube, Instagram and TikTok is notable. This is part of the Dutch Media Authority’s incremental approach, where it first targets the group with the most significant impact on viewers. Over time, it plans to place more influencers under scrutiny, including those with less followers and/or different video platforms. 

The Media Act makes an additional distinction between advertising, sponsoring and product placement with different labelling requirements for each:

In case of advertising, the video must clearly and visibly include the words “advertisement” or “promotion” or words of a similar meaning.

In case of product placement, the following statement is required (i) at the beginning and end of the video, and (ii) at the beginning and end of a commercial message: “This video/program contains product placement.”

In case of Sponsoring, the following statement is required at the beginning or end of the video: “This video/program is (also) brought to you by” or “This video/program is sponsored by [the name or logo of the sponsor].”

Furthermore, product placement is no longer permitted in videos consisting of news programs, programs about consumer affairs, programs of a religious or spiritual nature, and programs intended for children under 12 years of age. In addition, sponsoring of videos consisting of news, current events, or political information is no longer allowed.

In order to force the Major Influencer to comply with these additional advertising rules, the Dutch Media Authority has the power to (i) impose fines up to a maximum of EUR 225,000 per violation, (ii) impose an order under threat of penalty, and (iii) use the general powers under the Dutch General Administrative Law Act (Algemene wet bestuursrecht).

The new Policy Rule is a doubled-edged sword. On the one hand it clarifies which influencers must adhere to the Dutch Media Act’s additional advertising rules. On the other hand, as the Policy Rule is only step one of the Dutch Media Authority’s incremental approach, it remains unclear how supervision of influencers will develop over time. Major Influencers should fasten their seatbelts because the new Policy takes effect July 1.

2 See also our contribution to the Chambers Trends and Developments from earlier this year.

Wouter van Wengen is a member of the corporate practice in Greenberg Traurig’s Amsterdam office. He focuses his practice on intellectual property law, IT contracts and data protection law. He represents national and international clients in the creative sector, the technology industry, and a variety of other companies.

Wouter holds an LL.M. degree in information law at the University of Amsterdam, and an LL.M. degree in Intellectual Property Law at Indiana University Maurer School of Law and is a member of the Dutch Bar Association.

Radboud Ribbert focuses his practice on the area of intellectual property law and entertainment law. He is a specialized lawyer on copyright law, patent law and trademark law, and is a well-known litigator in these fields of expertise. Furthermore, Radboud represents well-known lyricists, rock bands and DJs in the Netherlands, as well as large companies, particularly in intellectual property matters. His practice also has an international focus, and he is frequently involved in international entertainment contracts.

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 3 Grant Square #141 Hinsdale, IL 60521  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 or toll free (877) 357-3317.  If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.